1. Whether The District Court And The Sixth Circuit Court Of Appeals Erred When They Denied The Petitioner A Certificate Of Appealability ("COA") Where The Petitioner Established (A) That Jurists Of Reason Could Debate The Correctness Of The District Court's Denial of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Relief/ And (B) The Petitioner Made A Substantial Showing Of The Denial Of A Constitutional Right?

2. Whether The Sixth Circuit/ When Denying The Petitioner A COA, Applied An Overly Burdensome COA Standard In Direct Contravention Of This Court's COA Precedents Governing The Standards Of Review For The Issuance Of A COA Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)?

3. Whether Jurists Of Reason Could Conclude Or Debate Whether The Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Claims Deserved Further Consideration Pursuant To A Grant Of A COA To Hear Claims That Possessed Substantial Merit?

Whether the district court and the sixth circuit court of appeals erred in denying the petitioner a certificate of appealability