1. When a district court issues erroneous jury instructions
that include (a) to consider conviction with less than guilt
beyond all reasonable doubt and (b) instruction that contravenes
the established Pattern Jury Instructions, crafted to address
a particular charged offense, violate an American citizens
Fifth and/or Sixth Amendment rights?

2. Does a district court seeking to secure a conviction that
does not comport to the plain language nor Congressional intent
of the statute, violate an American citizens Constitutional
rights?

3. Does the absence of expert testimony in a jury trial deprive
a defendant of their right to present a viable defense therefore
violate their Sixth Amendment right?

4. Does the Eleventh Circuit Court 's absence of the normal pro
cedures followed by other courts set precedential producing
opinions that is depriving inmates of a process that could reveal
them to be wrongfully incarcerated?

When a district court issues erroneous jury instructions that include (a) to consider conviction with less than guilt beyond all reasonable doubt and (b) instruction that contravenes the established Pattern Jury Instructions, crafted to address a particular charged offense, violate an American citizens Fifth and/or Sixth Amendment rights?