No. 19-5487
Martin Anthony Nino v. United States
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: violate due-process|civil-rights|8th-amendment|ba without an individualized determination of necess bail-reform-act civil-rights competency-restoration confinement due-process eighth-amendment mental-health
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) Does automatic confinement for competency restoration, without an individualized determination of whether confinement is necessary, violate due process?
(2) When confinement is unnecessary to achieve the government's interests in competency restoration, does it violate the Eighth Amendment?
(3) Is the federal competency statute amenable to a construction that requires a district court's finding of necessity before a defendant released under the Bail Reform Act may be confined before trial for competency restoration?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does automatic confinement for competency restoration, without an individualized determination of whether confinement is necessary, violate due-process
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2019-12-13
Reply of petitioner Martin Anthony Nino filed.
2019-12-02
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-11-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 2, 2019.
2019-11-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 25, 2019 to December 2, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-10-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 25, 2019.
2019-10-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 25, 2019 to November 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-09-25
Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders filed.
2019-09-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 25, 2019.
2019-09-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 25, 2019 to October 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-26
Response Requested. (Due September 25, 2019)
2019-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 6, 2019)
2019-07-03
Application (19A27) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 2, 2019.
2019-07-01
Application (19A27) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 25, 2019 to August 2, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Martin Anthony Nino
Mary Edith Cunningham — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
National Association of Federal Defenders
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent