1. Despite Uniformity of Case Law attending, did the Lower Court© make an aseantien ia thi© east ia denying Statutory Default Judgment to Petitioner ia support of a Corporate Defendant and violate US and California State Oonititutioaal Law, including Doeket Fraud deipite California and US Supreme Court Uniformity of Decision© in Default Judgments?

2. Despite Uniformity of Case Law attending, did the Lower Court© make an exception in thi© ease and violate US and California State Constitutional Law, a© well a© Qverrule the US Supreme Court in pursuing an Administrative Defense for a Corporate Defendant whieh purposely defaulted on it© obligation© in following Administrative Procedure before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission?

Did the lower courts make an exception in this case in denying statutory default judgment to the petitioner in support of a corporate defendant and violate U.S. and California constitutional law, including docket fraud despite uniformity of decisions in default judgments?