No. 19-5470
Spencer Tracy Holloway v. Michigan
IFP
Tags: brady-violation constitutional-claim due-process federal-question liberty-interest michigan-state-law post-conviction prosecutorial-disclosure sixth-judicial-circuit state-law supreme-court-rule-10
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
I
WHETHER THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT FOR
OAKLAND COUNTY DECIDED AN IMPORTANT FEDERAL
QUESTION IN A WAY THAT CONFLICTS WITH THE DECISION
OF BRADY VMARYLAND, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) HOLDING?
II
WHETHER THE STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPRIVED PETITIONER
OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW BY REFUSING TO ADDRESS HIS
CONSTITITONAL CLAIM DENYING A LIBERTY INTEREST
CREATED BY STATE LAW?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Judicial Circuit Court for Oakland County decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with the decision of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) holding?
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2019)
Attorneys
Spencer Tracy Holloway
Spencer Tracy Holloway — Petitioner