No. 19-5467

Tyrone Murray v. Wanda Collins, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-08-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claims due-process factual-allegations grievances motion-to-dismiss prison prisoner-rights pro-se retaliation standing
Latest Conference: 2019-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. Whether a pro se inmate complaint in a "Conspiracy to Commit Murder lawsuit must contain"specific facts" andlor is Subjected to a "1 Complaint stage?

II. Whether free speech protects a prison inmate from retaliction from prison Officials vin a disciplinsry report (oR) as a Consequence for filiny grievances andlor prison grievunces aghinst prison officials undlor complaininy about prison Conditions?

III, Whether the Eleventh Circvit abused its discretion by failiny to give me a Chunce to filed un initinl brief?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a Pro Se inmate Complaint in a Conspiracy to Commit Murder lawsuit must Contain Specific facts and/or is Subject to a Heightened Pleading Standard in the light of Fed. R. Civ. P. (4) (2)

Docket Entries

2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-07-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2019)

Attorneys

Tyrone Murray
Tyrone Murray — Petitioner