1. Judge McGiverin wrote, a final judgment and opinion not based
on the weigh of the facts, as he wrote, and that is an unsupported conclusion,
and I quote his Document 149, on page 2:
"The court does not weigh the facts , but instead ascertains whether the
"evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving
party. "
But all the steps I followed, were based on the evidence and its weight.

2. On page 8, Judge McGiverin wrote, disregrading my Interrogatory,
and all the evidence I submitted not only to the Court,
but following all required previous steps,
that, and I quote the Judge false quote on Page 8 of Docket 149, first sentence:
"Rosado did, in a way, address fact 11, which alleges that Santander
has always reported Rosado's accounts pursuant to the agreement."
This statement from the Judge is false, how can that be allowed?

3. By insisting precisely in what I took as Judicial Misconduct,
from previous Judge Garcia Gregory, Judge McGiverin final opinion
dismissed the evidence:
How a Court Judge decide, without counting the evidence, that the required
Discovery requirements were not met?

4. Even at the 3 main credit bureaus, and through the C.F.P.B. their first lawyer,
Mrs. Vanessa Munoz Martinez, received all the evidence
without missing anything, and she simply denied the bank was violating
the Fair Credit Reporting Act, but all evidence was received by her,
before the Lawsuit: Discovery requirements took place also at C.F.P.B.

5. None of the credit bureaus reported my complaints as frivolous,
or that there was no genuine dispute: it was the opposite,
and I have the right to dispute inaccurate information reported:
Rule 10, Reasons (a),(c); Document 149 7/24/2019; Docket 155 7/26/2019

6. Is also Judicial Misconduct to pretend our education is not enough to see
this egregious and hostile tactics, is an insult, but not even
their Judicial Council weigh the facts? Rule 10, Reasons (a),(c);
Guide to Judiciary Policy Document 149 7/24/2019; Docket 155 7/26/2019

7. All their insistence of accusing me, by Judges McGiverin and Garcia Gregory
but without the weigh of the evidence and against the evidence.
of not following the Rules, when the fact is. Judges here are the ones
not following the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

is because a Pro Se Plaintiff that complies with all, fast, and perfectly,
is a threat to their Pro Bono Program?

8. Is the Pro Bono Program used as a way to make favors to their colleage
attorneys?

9. If the Pro Bono Program is optional, then why a District Judge is allowed,
by specifc Rules, to freeze our Case without even asking if we accept first ?

10. Judge McGiverin is practicing Retaliation: I filed Misonduct complaints,
against Judges Garcia Gregory and Velez Rive, who took the Case
before him, because they are colleagues at the District Court of Puerto Rico?
This same Case, arrived at the First Circuit as

Whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment without weighing the evidence, disregarding interrogatories and evidence, and committing judicial misconduct