1) DID THE PANEL ERR BY HOL DING THAT THE "LAW OF THE CASE"
GOVERNED ITS DECI SION IN HOLDING THAT THE EVIDENCE WAS
LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO SUSTAIN THE PETITIONER'S
CONVI CTION?

2) DID THE PANEL ERR BY HOL DING THAT FOR PURPOSES OF A
CONVI CTION UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 924(C)(1)(A), WHETHER A
DEF ENDANT USED A PARTICUL AR FIREARM PERTAI NS TO THE
MEANS BY WHICH THE CRIME WAS COMMI TTED, AND
THEREF ORE A JURY IS NOT REQUI RED TO DETER MINE
UNANI MOUSL Y THAT A PARTI CUL AR F IREARM W AS USED?

Did the panel err by holding that the 'law of the case' governed its decision in holding that the evidence was legally sufficient to sustain the petitioner's conviction?