Has the Third Circuit improperly determined that domicile of Plaintiff can be based exclusively on the determination of domicile in a subsequently filed case - conflicting with decisions of other Circuits?

Has the Third Circuit so far departed from accepted procedures to require This Court to exercise the court's supervisory powers - as the Third Circuit has permitted Dismissal of both the Instant Matter (and the subsequently filed case) as the result of undue deference to clearly improper decisions by obviously biased jurists from the district court?

Was Due Process denied when domicile was decided (by a highly biased jurist) without notice?

Has the Third Circuit improperly determined that domicile of Plaintiff can be based exclusively on the determination of domicile in a subsequently filed case - conflicting with decisions of other Circuits?