No. 19-5448
Antolin Torres Abonza v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing deference due-process federal-courts judicial-discretion sentencing-factors sentencing-review standard-of-review substantive-reasonableness substantive-reasonableness-review
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily encompasses some degree of reweighing the sentencing factors?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily encompasses some degree of reweighing the sentencing factors?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-08-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Antolin Torres Abonza
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent