1. WERE THE FETITIDNER'S RIGHT TO THE UNITED STATES AND FLURIDA CONSTITUTIONS EGREGIOUSLY VIOLATED BY FLORIDA CIRCUIT ANS APPEUATE COURTS?

2. SHOULD STATE APPELLATE COURTS MAKE FINAL JUDICIAL DECTSIONS ON CASES WHERE APPELLEE/DEFENDANT IS NOT PROPERLY NOJTFIED OF IH ANY PATET OF THE APPEAL PROUESS, IN VIOCATDON f PROVISIONAL PROTECTIONS UNDBR STATE AND FEDERAL CONSTITUSTONS, WEU SETTLED. SUBSTANJIVE FLOTIDA LAW, ARD RULES Of COURT POOCEDURES?

3. SHOULD THS STATZ OF LORIDA, AFTEN EMPANELING AND SWOANING IN THE JURy, DISCHHARGING THE PLAATIF DUE TO INTENJIONAL PROSBCUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, AND ORDERING THE CAGE CLOORD By FIWAL OpDiR , BE AULOWED TO LATER RETRY THE PLAINTIFH WIJHE THE SAMB CHANGR AS FEDGRAL CONSTITUJTONAL RIGHTS AEAINST DONBLE JROPARDY.

Whether the petitioner's right to the writ of certiorari was unconstitutionally denied by the Florida appellate court