Question Presented (from Petition)
Where the district court wrote that Petitioner "raises issues worthy of judicial review," has the Fifth Circuit again applied an overly restrictive standard for granting COA and has Petitioner established that the reasonableness of the state court's denial of his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is, at least, debatable among reasonable jurists?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fifth Circuit applied an overly restrictive standard for granting a certificate of appealability (COA) where the district court found that the petitioner raised issues worthy of judicial review, and whether the petitioner established that the reasonableness of the state court's denial of his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is debatable among reasonable jurists
2019-10-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-10-15
Reply of petitioner Christopher Jackson filed.(10/17/2019)
2019-10-03
Brief of respondent Lorie Davis in opposition filed.
2019-08-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 3, 2019.
2019-08-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 3, 2019 to October 3, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-07-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 3, 2019)
2019-06-12
Application (18A1190) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until July 10, 2019.
2019-06-07
Application (18A1190) to extend further the time from June 20, 2019 to July 10, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.
2019-05-17
Application (18A1190) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 20, 2019 to July 19, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.
2019-05-17
Application (18A1190) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until June 20, 2019.