ISSUE NUMBER ONE: Appeal Counsel only raised one point of error. It was a question regarding the Complainant. That she had been

ISSUE NUMBER TWO: Appeal Counsel would not raise a claim of Ineffective Assistance of Trial Counsel on Direct Appeal. Because this was an actual arraignment hearing trial. And that Appeal Counsel should have raised that this was an actual arraignment trial/Indicting proceeding.

ISSUE NUMBER THREE: The Court of Appeals modified tie trial courts judgment in the effects of enhancements that proved that this was only an arraignment trial hearing.

ISSUE NUMBER FOUR: The court of appeals affirms that a Grandjury found that is a Petitioner of Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child as what

Whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the trial court's judgment that this was an actual arraignment/indictment proceeding rather than a trial on the merits