No. 19-5422

Michael A. Webb v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: adam-walsh-act adam-walsh-child-protection-and-safety-act constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-prosecution double-jeopardy ineffective-assistance plea-agreement plea-bargaining sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

Was petitioner, Michael A. Webb, subjective to ineffective assistance of counsel or deficient representation by defense counsel in a prosecution?

Was petitioner, Michael A. Webb, subjective to illegal sentence in imposition of the totality of the combined sentence(s) above the sentence guidelines and sentence neccessary for deterrance?

Was petitioner, Michael A. Webb, lead into ambiguous plea agreement by and through deficient representation of defense counsel with agreement with the respondent?

Was petitioner, Michael A. Webb, subjective to double jeopardy in the sentencing for his crime?

Was petitioner, Michael A. Webb, constitutional rights violated in conviction and sentencing of his criminal prosecution?

Is Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act unconstitutional as enacted by Congress?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2019)

Attorneys

Michael A. Webb
Michael A. Webb — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent