1) Can fraud be allowed to be committed as the underlying reason for dismissal of a
complaint?

2) Can evidence of fraud used to dismiss the complaint be obfuscated through the failure by
the clerk s office to docket plaintiff 5 s motions, resulting in dismissal of the overall appeal,
and plaintiff s false imprisonment?

3) This case involves an initial civil complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.§ 1983 against the
court reporting firm, and others, responsible for the falsification of state court transcripts
that were deliberately altered to falsely imprison plaintiff. At USCA 's directive, plaintiff
also filed a subsequent petition of writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Can
the underlying 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint be dismissed on appeal, effectively absolving
named defendants from any liability for the intentional altering and falsifying of trial
transcripts, prior to plaintiff s petition for writ of habeas corpus being ruled on, outlining
as the falsification of transcripts utilized to falsely imprison plaintiff?

4) Are federal "whistle blower protections " available to litigants exposing fraud in the
and federal judicial systems, to prevent retaliation for exposing such criminal malfeasance?
Or to prevent retaliation for exposing such criminal malfeasance? Or to prevent their
from being erroneously dismissed?

5) Is excluded evidence in a party 's motion that was intentionally failed to be recorded or
docketed, and attempted to be hidden, valid grounds to reopen case if such evidence pro
material to such fraud committed? Or for USCA to rule?

state
cases
ves

Can fraud be allowed to be committed as the underlying reason for dismissal of a complaint?