1. Did the Ninth Circuit err by failing to address whether a reasonable officer in Detective Lambert's position would have objectively believed his conduct, in deciding what information to include or not to include in the affidavit, was lawful in light of clearly established law?

2. Did the Ninth Circuit err by failing to address whether Plaintiffs made a substantial showing of deliberate falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth by Detective Lambert?

Whether the Fourth Amendment requires a warrant to search a home based on probable cause and exigent circumstances when the home is owned by a third party who is not suspected of any wrongdoing