(pendent jurisdiction):
a.
27(d), (g), (i) and L.R. 40.2 of the Local Rules and Internal Operating
Procedures of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, local statute 22
NYCRR 500.20(d) (collateral claims of pendent jurisdiction), the recently
provided dismissals of CESTUI QUE STEVEN TALBERT WILLIAMS u.
UNITED
STATES,
ET
AL.,
18cv12064(LLS)(SDNY),
19240(JAC)(PWH)(JMW)(2nd Cir. Ct.) (see Appendix A and B. U.S. S.Ct. Rule
14.1(i)(vi)) and what delineates "an adequate, alternative mean[] of obtaining
relief' when judicial officials cite "Cheney U. U.S. Dist. Ct. for D.C., 542 U.S.
367, 380-81 (2004)" for a reason to dismiss reconsideration motions?

i.
Upon affirmation of a justified reconsideration by PLAINTIFF (see
Appendix B. U.S. S.Ct. Rule 14.1(i)(vi)), will the Court see just to provide
a sua sponté order to reopen the above trial (Dock. Nos. 19-240), by writ of
error, in question of Fed. R. Civ. P. 60?

2. U.S. S.Ct. Rule 11:
Under Rule 11 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States (U.S.
a.
S.Ct. Rules), seeking review of a district court judgment before a judgment
within an appeal, if the district court's judgment references associated appeal
trials, may those associated appeal trials be sought for review within the
same certiorari, either under U.S. S.Ct. Rule 11 and/or U.S. S.Ct. Rule 12.4
(closely related multiple judgments)?

Whether the Court will provide for further questioning upon Fed. R. App. P. 27, L.R. 27(d), (g), (i) and L.R. 40.2 of the Local Rules and Internal Operating Procedures of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, local statute 22 NYCRR 500.20(d) (collateral claims of pendent jurisdiction), the recently provided dismissals of CESTUI QUE STEVEN TALBERT WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES, ET AL., 18cv12064(LLS)(SDNY), 19-240(JAC)(PWH)(JMW)(2nd Cir. Ct.)