No. 19-5390

In Re Francisco Narvaez

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-07-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: adequate-representation civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fifth-amendment ineffective-assistance-counsel legal-representation procedural-error professional-conduct sixth-amendment speedy-trial
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

Therefore, my concerns or questins it's plenty, first of all I am a poor man without schooled in any Laws, then I even had much school in Spanish nor in English, so i've been learned a little bit meanwhile I have been incarcerated. Whereby, I'll say I had more than ten Attorneys for my defense but not one of them had been performed in my behalf. so I've been a victim of misrepresentation, of all these Lawyres I had. Pure and clear lack of adequate performance. see e.g.,

18 U.S.C. §3006A-Adequate Repersentation of Defendants:
see also, Model Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4(b) the Lawyres Should be;

Then, all these counsels I had, each of them failed to performed on my behalf, any motion to suppress the evidence, lack of peedy trial, so I had any diligence or any knowledge of these procedure so I've learned a little bit meanwhile I've been imprisonment.

Thus, the most important, matter is herein, so that means the loyalty to this. Honerable U.S. Constitution. see,

Guarranty by The Sixth Amendment:

Due-Process by the Federal Governmant. U.S. Const, Amend V'(". No Person Shall be Deprive of life, liberty, or Property, without Due-Process of the Law ") nemo est supra leges.

see also, The Peamble of the Constitution, has never been regarded, a source of any substantive Power conferred on Government of United States, or any of its Departments. Jacbson v. Massachusetts, (1905) 197 US 11, 49 L. Ed 643 25 S. Ct. 358. i.e.,

So the clear and pure errors in t

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel was violated due to his attorneys' failure to file a motion to suppress evidence and ensure a speedy trial

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-16
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 29, 2019)

Attorneys

Francisco Narvaez
Francisco Narvaez — Petitioner
UNITED STATES
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent