I Did the Circuit Court issue a final mandate that was a conflict of law, established by its own court?

II Did the Circuit Court err when declined to recall the mandate of an opinion which was overturned 3 days prior to its issuance?

III Did the District Court err by adding a "something more" caveat, not listed in the statutory provisions of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure regarding Motions, Rule 60(b)? At the same time, failed to consider or address, the listed Judicial impediments created by the 6th Circuit and clear evidence that the District Court opinion was based on a misinterpretation of the court record? All of which, would have comfortably satisfied the ambiguous, "something more", reasoning by the District Judge.

IV Did the Circuit Court err by ignoring established court rules when it denied petitioner the statutory time to challenge a supplemental authority submitted by the state. The result of which, directly and fatally impacted the outcome of the proceedings?

V Did the Circuit Court err when it ignored a docketed motion, which was both pertinent and properly filed by petitioner. The result of which, directly and fatally impacted the outcome of the proceedings?

VI. Are the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure void of an avenue to address a change of law concurrent with a Circuit Court Opinion.

Did the Circuit Court issue a final mandate that was a conflict of law, established by its own court?