DID PETITIONER ASSERT A VALID CLAIM OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO COUNSEL WHERE COUNSEL'S ACTIONS FAILED TO ADEQUATELY TEST THE PROSECUTION'S CASE AND COUNSEL'S ACTIONS ONLY WORKED TO PETITIONER'S DETRIMENT?

II WHERE THE STATE USE "MISCONDUCT" TO OBTAIN A CONVICTION UPON A VINDICTIVE AND MULTIPLICITOUS INDICTMENT? DID PETITIONER STATE A CLAIM THERETO?

I DID THE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF THE ERRORS IN THIS CASE RESULT IN A VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS WARRANTING RELIEF?

DOUBLE JEOPARDY PROVISIONS INVOKED AGAINST A VINDICTIVE AND MULTIPLICITOUS INDICTMENT WARRANTING RELIEF THERETO.?

I HOW THE RIGHT NOT TO BE DEPRIVED OF LIFE AND LIBERTY EXCEPT BY PROOF OF GUILT BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT PROTECTS THE GUILTY FROM A VINDICTIVE AND MULTIPLICITOUS INDICTMENT RETURNED AGAINST THE PETITIONER.?

Whether the petitioner has a valid claim of a constitutional right to be free from a vindictive and multiplicitous indictment that he now stands convicted under