No. 19-5363
Richard Curtis v. Lyneal Wainwright, Warden
IFP
Tags: constitutional-law constitutional-violation criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process judicial-review merger sentencing void-for-vagueness
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether separately imposed sentences prior to merge, constitutes multiple sentences in violation of the Double Jeopardy clause; and
Whether this makes the sentence void.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether separately imposed sentences prior to merge, constitutes multiple sentences in violation of the Double Jeopardy clause
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-04-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2019)
Attorneys
Richard Curtis
Richard Curtis — Petitioner