No. 19-5360
Curtis Nairn v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights counsel counsel-assistance due-process exhaustion-of-remedies florida-corrections florida-department-of-corrections futility-doctrine habeas-corpus prisoner-rights spencer-sanction spencer-sanctions standing state-court-exhaustion state-courts
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether it would be futile for a prisoner to return to State Courts to have
unexhausted claims exhausted with the assistance of counsel under Florida
Spencer Sanction law based on the explicit language itself.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether it would be futile for a prisoner to return to State Courts to have unexhausted claims exhausted with the assistance of counsel Under Florida Spencer Sanction law based on the explicit language itself
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-31
Waiver of right of respondent Inch, Sec., FL DOC to respond filed.
2019-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2019)
Attorneys
Curtis Nairn, et al.
Curtis Nairn — Petitioner
Inch, Sec., FL DOC
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent