QUESTION(S) PRESENTED FOR THE COLORADO LEGAL SERVICES

1- Defendants who have known about petitioner 's disabilities status, but he or she
intentionally indifferent and exploited of impairment of petitioner on the purpose to
suppress on lawsuit, and medical treatment is violation to the American with Disabilities
Act?

2- Defendants who have known petitioner 's disabilities status, have known petitioner is
Asian; is under protected class, but defendants ignored that qualified and suppressed on
lawsuit is violation to ADA, and 42 U.S.C. 1981?

3- Pursuant to the Sec 504 Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) petitioner was
qualified for receive an assistant from Federal assistant, but defendants intentionally
denied for that benefit is violation to the Sec 504 Rehabilitation Act?

4- Discrimination can be direct or indirect; petitioner was an Asian and a victimization of
defendants ' violation; defendants with apparently evidences of violation to petitioner 's
rights, but they 're American white and under protected by judges; were they 're in act of
racial discrimination?

5- Petitioner was injured and damaged with significantly evidences, but judges dismissed
petitioner 's complaint without hearing and trial was violated to the Seventh and
Fourteenth Amendment?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED FOR THE STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY et al

1-Petitioner in seriously injured, with long history of medical care, ongoing treatment,
and permanently disabled cause by this accident. Complaint of petitioner is demanded for
justice with significantly evidences; is this complaint justifiable or frivolous?

2- Petitioner was suffering a seriously injured, but complaints of petitioner were
thdismissed without hearing and trial, were Judges and Courts in violation to 7
Amendment and 14th Amendment?

3- Deprived petitioner 's Civil Rights had secured in 7th Amendment and 14th Amendment
then imputed to petitioner 's complaints were frivolously? Was this an injustice?

4- Exploited the impairment of disabilities litigant is violation to 42 U.S.C. 1981 (c)?
Defendant who were deprived the benefit of law, deprived the enjoyment of life of petitioner,
and maltreated to petitioner in medical care, intend subject to like punishment and pains to
petitioner is violation to 42 U.S.C. 1981(a)?

5- Petitioner 's Civil Rights secured under 7th and 14th Amendment had been deprived by
defendants; were they in violation to 42 U.S.C. 1983?

6- Were the connivance among defendants on the purposed to disrupt treatment plan of
petitioner? And they 're in violation to the 42 U.S.C. 1985?

7- Were the actions to disrupt on treatment plan of petitioner can be preventing by an
effort to bring the benefits to petitioner? And they 're in violation to 42 U.S.C. 1986?

8- Were the connivance between Courts or Judges and State Farm Insurance Company
counsel in the dismissed case 16cv02728 RBJ?

Whether defendants who have known about petitioner's disabilities status, but were intentionally indifferent and exploited the impairment of petitioner to suppress a lawsuit, violate the Americans with Disabilities Act