Whether all courts violated the law of the United States Constitution when they overlooked, Under the exclusionary rule violation of the 4th Amendment, police misconduct and evidence derived from the poisonous tree can not be used in a criminal trial against the victim of the illegal search and seizure US v Perkins 349 F.2d 15; the petitioner is protected by the USCASS USCA AG). DOYLE VOWED, 96 S.Ct 8H

Whether all courts violated Constitutional law when they overlooked the 6th amendment violation. The 5th amendment Commenting directly or to testify Gritein V california 360 us 6og! Darden. Jv wainwright 1F# U.S. 16% quoting. Denney v Dechristo. oro. Ylo U.S 632} State DIGUTITO YO! ad Nag uz 396 us 18

Whether all courts overlooked federal law and US Constitution. When They overlooked Federal Rule 2andy which state" Provide that and written sworn Complaint Setting the offen Change SeeGiordeneiin uv U.S. 3357 US. 490! 78 S5.c4/OUS) oP SO PU GOCA Klein 143 SUPP G30. 639-639} 33/__E_ Supp _II#A.; 1934 the Federal Courts require Strict compliance with the feguifement. HOF Rule. 3. See Brown. v_Daggan_399 F Supp QOF

Whether the courts overlooked federal law and the U.S. Constitution when they overlooked the 4th Amendment exclusionary rule, the 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination, and the requirements of Federal Rule 3 for a sworn complaint