No. 19-5317
Alonzo Vernon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review chapman-v-california constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence fair-trial harmless-error jones-v-stinson sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Second Circuit's decision in the instant case created a conflict with the Court's decision in Chapman, supra?
Further, whether the Second Circuit's decision in the instant case created precedent that will allow the government to change its theory of a case, at the eleventh hour, without any proof of that theory and violate defendants' rights to due process as a result?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Second Circuit's decision in the instant case created a conflict with the Court's decision in Chapman, supra?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-07-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 23, 2019)
Attorneys
Alonzo Vernon
Rachael Elizabeth Reese — O'Brien Hatfield, P.A., Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent