No. 19-5304
Michael Paul Puzey v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 38-usc-7253 appellate-review article-iii civil-procedure constitutional-error due-process judicial-procedure jurisdictional-standard legal-interpretation procedural-review standing statutory-interpretation subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Appellate count committed a manifest of Constitutional error by failing to adhere to its obligations and duty under Article il subsection.
2. and a8 Us.c. 453 to satisfy itself that Article 111 subsection 2. subject-matter jurisdiction was proven and existed in Petitioner case ab initio ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Appellate Court committed a Manifest error by Failing to adhere to its obligations and duty under Article III, subsection 2, and 38 U.S.C. 7253 to Satisfy itself that Subject-matter Jurisdiction was Proven and existed in Petitioner case ab initio
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2019)
Attorneys
Michael P. Puzey
Michael Paul Puzey — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent