No. 19-5269
Reginald Christopher Gilbert v. United States
Tags: appellate-procedure appellate-review criminal-law criminal-procedure defendant-rights federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure judicial-review jurisdiction objection reasonableness reasonableness-standard sentencing sentencing-review
Latest Conference:
2019-11-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a formal objection after pronouncement of sentence is necessary to invoke appellate reasonableness review of the length of a defendant's sentence.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a formal objection after pronouncement of sentence is necessary to invoke appellate reasonableness review of the length of a defendant's sentence
Docket Entries
2019-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-11-05
Reply of petitioner Reginald Gilbert filed. (Distributed)
2019-10-21
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2019-09-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 21, 2019.
2019-09-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 20, 2019 to October 21, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 20, 2019.
2019-08-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 21, 2019 to September 20, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-07-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 21, 2019)
Attorneys
Reginald Gilbert
Philip J. Lynch — Law Offices of Phil Lynch, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent