No. 19-5221
Richard Potts v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights collateral-review constitutional-claim constitutional-provisions criminal-procedure due-process federal-procedure habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance jurisdiction sentencing standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does Honeycutt v. United States, 137 S.Ct. de (2o1) apply retoactively o frfeiture judgment, that have been final foryears, on collateral review?
Can relief be obtained on collateral review Dursuant to 28U.S.C.& 1651 in the nature jedei a writ of audita querela when 28 U.SC $2241 & & 2a55(h)a) prohibits a collateral attack on non-custodial final forfeiture Money Judgments?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether collateral review is available to obtain relief under 28 USC § 2255 in the circumstances presented
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 19, 2019)
Attorneys
Richard Potts
Richard Potts — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent