This Case involves the Trial and Appellate Counsels Performance falling Below an objective Standard of Reasonableness, that prejudice the Petitioner.

1. Did The Trial and Appellate Counsels Performance Fall Below An Objective Standard of Reasonableness; Did The Deficient Performance Prejudice The Defendant?

2. Did Petitioner Conviction and Sentence were Obtained In Violation of his - Sixth, Amendments Right of The United State Constitution?

3. Under the Circumstances of the Underlying Case, Can A Reasonable jurist Find the District Court's Assessment of Medina's Constitutional Claims Debatable or Wrong?

Did the trial and appellate counsel's performance fall below an objective standard of reasonableness and prejudice the petitioner?