Was Petitioner's conviction obtained by use of evidence obtained by unreasonable search and seizure?

2. Was violation of United States Constitution Amendment XIV by application of clause 1 interpretation of existing law fix post-facto arbiter § 1.

3. Was there ineffective assistance of counsel?

4. Was Petitioner charged in a disjunctive unauthorized short form indictment contrary to the United States Constitution?

5. Did Petitioner's prayer that the writ would be in aid of the courts appellate jurisdiction when exceptional circumstances warrant the exercise of the court's discretionary powers, and can adequate relief cannot be obtained in any other form or any other court? Rule 20, IV.

Was the conviction obtained by use of evidence obtained by unreasonable search and seizure?