No. 19-5216
Nicholas Pagliuca v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal-waiver circuit-split criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure guilty-plea plain-error plea-bargaining rule-11 vonn-v-united-states
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the plain error standard of Vonn/Dominguez Benitez applies in the context of violations of Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(b)(1)(N), where the defendant raises an omission in the guilty plea inquiry as a basis for the non-enforcement of an appeal waiver, not to vacate the guilty plea -- an issue that divides the circuits.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the plain error standard of Vonn/Dominguez Benitez applies in the context of violations of Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(b)(1)(N), where the defendant raises an omission in the guilty plea inquiry as a basis for the non-enforcement of an appeal waiver, not to vacate the guilty plea
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 16, 2019)
Attorneys
Nicholas Pagliuca
Darrell Bernard Fields — Federal Defenders of New York, Inc., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent