No. 19-5215
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2255-motion appellate-review circuit-court clearly-erroneous criminal-procedure habeas-corpus law-of-the-case manifest-injustice procedural-error sixth-circuit
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. RESULTED IN A MANIFEST INJUSTICE?
2. DID THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ERR BY DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXPAND COA ISSUES TO INCLUDE A CLAIM THE DISTRICT COURT FAILED TO ADDRESS AND DECIDE ON THE MERITS?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Sixth Circuit err by holding the district court properly applied the law-of-the-case to an issue presented in 2255 motion when prior appellate court decision was clearly erroneous and resulted in a manifest injustice?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 19, 2019)
Attorneys
Lowrell Neal
Lowrell Neal — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent