1. Was patitionar daniad affactiv3 assistanc3 of counsal balow
th3 standard mandats of tha Unitad Statas Constitution Amandmant
Six ?

2. Was patitonar d3ni3d du3 jjrocass by tha court balow not
allowing tha patitionar to fila a Fadaral Habaas Corpus Patition
basa on factual avidanc3 that was not discovarad until aftar
tima for appaal and discovarad aftar tim3 to fil3 Fadaral Habaas,
Corpus patition ?

3. Was th3 District Court arr by traat tha naw patition with
sacond succassiva Fadaral Habaas Corpus patition ?
Whan is a naw Fadaral Habaas Corpus Patition and Naw ground
of " I.A.C." claim point out for Patitionar by tha District
Judga ?

4. Was Patitionar's conviction sacurad by way of dafansa counsal
and Prosacutor witholding avidanc3 in violation of
Brady v.Maryland ?

5. Was P3tition3r's conviction sacurad by way of dafansa/ and
District Attornay's Misscarria of Justica/Actual innocanca ?
Mandata of tha Unitad Statas Constitution ?

6. Doss Patition msst tha critaria of Slack v.McDanial,

Was petitioner denied effective assistance of counsel below the standard mandate of the United States Constitution Amendment Six?