No. 19-5193

Jonathan R. Burrs v. United Technologies Corporation, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fifth-amendment fraud fraud-upon-court fraud-upon-the-court judicial-bias judicial-misconduct motion-to-dismiss procedural-obstruction seventh-amendment standing summary-judgment
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does a District Court Judge engage in a Fraud Upon The Court by participating in the theft of a Petitioner's Opposition to a Respondent's Motion To Dismiss during the proceedings, where the Judge intentionally misrepresents the official record in the Final Order, covering up for the disappearance of a Petitioner's Opposition.

Has Due Process and the "appearance of justice" been satisfied when District Court personnel with the assistance of the District Court Judge, steal, obstruct, and dispose of a Petitioner's Opposition to a Respondent's Motion to Dismiss effectively denying a Petitioner the right to Due Process and opportunity to oppose a Respondents Motion.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a District Court Judge engage in a Fraud Upon The Court

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED. Justice Breyer and Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-07
Waiver of right of respondents United Technologies Corp., et al. to respond filed.
2019-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 15, 2019)

Attorneys

Jonathan R. Burrs
Jonathan R. Burrs — Petitioner
United Technologies Corp., et al.
Erin McPhail WettySeyfarth Shaw L.L.P, Respondent