Should this court review this case because all citizens of our country must have the freedom to find their own individual way of accessing the constitutional right of personal liberty.

How does the April 10, 2019 order by the California Supreme Court summarily denying review of a denial of a peremptory writ of mandate by the lower court and a fee waiver submitted to its court for a polygraph in the same order not violate the constitutional right of personal liberty for all citizens of our country who are of a class specification such as an SSI recipient, who often suffer discrimination in their community making it difficult for them to be believed, many unable to afford or obtain an attorney?

The question is whether this court should review why the right of personal privacy is not definitive under any First Amendment of our US Constitution in a manner which an average person in our country can understand?

Should this court review this case because all citizens of our country must have the freedom to find their own individual way of accessing the constitutional right of personal liberty