No. 19-5130
Tammie McConico v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-courts circumstantial-evidence equal-protection federal-circuit-courts reasonable-doubt sixth-amendment standard-of-review
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Sixth Amendment requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, even in a circumstantial case? And whether the Equal Protections Clause is violated when there is a conflict amongst the federal circuit courts of appeal dealing with what the standard of review is when reviewing circumstantial evidence cases?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, even in a circumstantial case?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Tammie McConico
Rachael Elizabeth Reese — O'Brien Hatfield, P.A., Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent