The question presented involves the Florida practice and rule which do not permit litigants to seek review in the Florida Supreme Court when the district courts of appeal issue unelaborated Affirmance (PCA's) of trial court's decision. The issue is whether this practice unconstitutionally deprives Florida residents to full and complete access to their courts in violation of their Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment equal protection rights in that it individualously discriminates against Florida residents, wherefore under those rights can a tribunal and intermediate appellant court act as the highest court and / or court of last resort to deny relief based on fraud?

Whether the Florida practice and rule that do not permit litigants to seek review in the Florida Supreme Court when the district courts of appeal issue unelaborated Affirmance (PCA's) of trial court's decision unconstitutionally deprives Florida residents of full and complete access to their courts in violation of their Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment equal protection rights