Whether a Court of Appeals' denial of a certificate of appealability conflicts with this Court's rulings in Vasquez v. Hillery, 474 U.S. 254, 260 (1986), and Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003), where the district court determined that ineffective assistance of counsel claims were exhausted even though the federal claims included robust and disturbing factual allegations as compared to the state court claims whose factual allegations were sparse and qualitatively neutral.

Whether a Court of Appeals' denial of a certificate of appealability conflicts with this Court's rulings in Vasquez v. Hillery and Miller-El v. Cockrell, where the district court determined that ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims were exhausted even though the federal claims included robust and disturbing factual allegations as compared to the state court claims whose factual allegations were sparse and qualitatively neutral