1. Did the United States Court of Appeals, For The fifth Circuit, lack federal statutory law jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §2244 (b),(3),(D), when more than the thirty days allowed under law, the Court ruled on Petitioner's August 14, 2017 filed request for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. §2254 writ of habeas corpus on. October. 24,- 2017?

2. Did the Office of the Clerk, Deputy Clerk, Cindy M. Broadhead, of the United States Court of Appeals, For the Fifth Circuit, commit obstruction of justice in violation of Title 18 U-S-C. §1512 (b),(2),(A), by interpreting 28 U-S-C. §2244 (b),(3), (E) to not permit "REVIEW" under the Federal Rules of Civil Prodee; re dure, Rule 60 (b,(4) of Petitioner's August 14, 2017 filed request for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. §2254 writ-df habeas corpus, on February 20, 2018?

Did the United States Court of Appeals, For The Fifth Circuit, lack federal statutory law jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §2244(b),(3),(D), when more than the thirty days allowed under law, the Court ruled on Petitioner's August 14, 2017 filed request for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. §2254 writ of habeas corpus on October 24, 2017?