1)
IF
Your OriqNAl IndiCtmeNt is lAte ANd dismissed
UNder 18 USC 316/A)
qrantina the Ends oF Justice . Wher You Get A Second Irdictment
When the First InDictment is Untimley Following Proper procesuires And prokeAll
Not Following proper proteall ?
(UNDER 18 USC 3IGI (6))"OHiO SAViNgS"
suppost tobe (sth 3id].
IF I CAN ouly AlACk collateral ANd Infective Cousoul CIAiM ANd the
qover ment Agree's to InkectiveNess for the Atorney
dismissing my orignal
I Ndictment
Gives me qrounds to set A side the Waiver Inthe plea aqreemen
IF the oriqual "Indictment" is "Not" "Correteded" And Untimley As well A UNconstitow
Then following the chnin of command, The "plea agreement" Would Also be
UNcoNstifionAL, As well As The "WAiver" ThAt's IN the "Plea aqreement"
ANd INPRiSONMENt INVALIO ANd UNCONSTitONL ?
ThiS woUld AlSo MAKe the JoriSdistiON INVALID ANd UNCONStitiONAL
So why is it the goverment Aomit's to Infective counsol And speedy trial
ACt ViolAtion's ANo BAis the JurisdictiNol Issves with the UncoNstifowAL
WAiver wheN I have Ground's to RAise these Issves through INfectiuwess
COUNSOL thAt the INUAlIO ple Doe's wOt
BaR me from
7
ThiS
would
SAtisby"Stricklaud's"fu prowg test". Under UNcoustitrol clAims
ANd GrANt MY (COA).SO hOW CAN A DistriCt Court KeEp DeNyiNg All those
Ground's" 3
(8
VAliD ReasoN UNDer 3161 (Hl7C) So How did the CowtiNvaNCe qet
CH/2111

Whether the dismissal of the first indictment under 18 USC 3161(b) and the subsequent untimely indictment without an alignment violates due process and the right to a speedy trial