I.) Whether the 'State .Court had causeda conflict within the
State Court ignoring its controlling governed caselaw People v,
Thomason 173 Mich. App, 812(quoting Grigg v.People 31 Mich.
"Where the record does not reveal that the
the conviction must be set aside"...And470.471) states that:
defendant was arraigned,
the Petitioner was not arraigned upon his warrantless arrest and
there's no record/transcript x^ithin the court file?

2.) Where there is a
that provided: "Amandatory Michigan Court Rule NCR 6.104(F)
verbatim record must be made of the
states :
defendant xras
"Thomas 173 Mich.arraignment." And a controlling State Court caselax* that
Where the record does not reveal that the
the conviction must be set aside. arraigned,
App, 812 (qouting Grigg 31 Mich, at 471).
Court bound to act upon its mandatory court rule thatIs the lower State
s connected
to a controlling State caselax? remedy, where there is no verbatim
record x^ithin the court file to show that an arraignment wastruly held?

3.) Whether a person is under a continuation of restraint of his
liberty by the State's failure to arraign him on his warrantless
case to
, thatarrest upon the complaint and warrant and allox^ed the
proceed forward without
resulted in a conviction?conducting such arraignment

4.) What is the proper remedy for a violation of
Process Rights through the 14th Amendment,
cannot produce a record/transcript ofa person's Due
when the State Court
Arraignment being held an
on a person that was arrested without a warrant for two different
felony offenses and was never brought before 3 Magistrate Judge
to be arraigned on the Complaint and warrant, and the State still
proceeded forward with the felony prosecution?

Whether the State Court had caused a conflict within the State Court ignoring its controlling governed caselaw