Jason Hendershott v. Kelly Strong, Warden, et al.
(1) Should Hendershott have been barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 when he turned his docs over to prison Authorities to mail Feb. 2014 months before his deadline?
(2) Did the U.S. D.C. Violate Hendershott's Procedure Protection when the Court denied him to amend his original complaint?
(3) Have Harm, and Denial of Access to Courts been violated when Defendants lost his Legal Materials and time from the original losing of his docs?
(4) Should Hendershott have been appointed Counsel due to his mental illnesses to help him litigate and submit legal documents to the Courts?
(5) Should the 5th Circuit have allowed Hendershott to file an out of time rehearing?
(6) Was Hendershott denied Access to Courts?
Whether Hendershott was improperly denied time-credit for turning in his 2854 year old prison authorities to mail months before his deadline