Custody: 1.why des reasne opinions of jurist thoughout the federal system demonstrate that frirminded jurist can disagree As to whether the use of handcuff, without morestrnsforms An otherwise non-Custodial traffic stop into A Custodial interrogation?

2.Would a "reasonable person" in Petitioner's* Position""have felt he was"At liberty to terminate the traffic stop interrogation And leave in handcuffs?

3. CAn firminded jurist disagree over whether Petitioner "being handcuffed,"was not in Custody?

Statement:Does Petitioner have the privalege of 5th Amendment rights, not to be A witness AgAinst himself?

2. How cAn A Court make A de termination; Petitioner was not in Custody when he made the statement" without watching the video DUD of the traffic stop?

3.When wAs Petitioner's statement obtained by of offécer DiAl?

Why does Geasoned Opinions of _jprist Thou out the federal system demonstrate that freminded ytist can disagree AS +o Whether the use of handtudfs jturthout morestrans-voor AN ohecwise non~ Custodial tewffic stop into © custodhal \\nr cog ptions