IF THE ORDER FROM THE DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SEVENTEEN ALLOWED PETITIONER TO PROCEEDED WITH HIS COLORABLE CAUSE OF ACTION OF ACCESS TO THE COURT WHEN THE RESPONDENTS DID NOT PROVIDED HIM WITH A CERTIFIED FILED MARKED OF THE RECORD CAN HE PROCEED WITH A PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS SO IN THE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT?, WHY DIDN'T THE DISTRICT COURT GIVE HIM RELIEF?

IS IT NOT DUE PROCESS OF LAW PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURES RULE 55, 57 AND 88 PERTAINING TO DEFAULT AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY (150) DAYS AFTER WITH NO RESPONSE TILL "MARCH 06T 2019" BY THE RESPONDENTS?

Whether the district court erred in denying petitioner's claim of denying access to the court and equal protection of law and due process under the Fourteenth and First Amendment