No. 19-5040
Jennifer Lu v. Stanford University
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-procedure-amendment complaint-amendment dismissal district-court-procedure due-process judicial-guidance leave-to-amend legal-notice pleading pleading-deficiencies pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-fairness
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether when granting a pro se litigant leave to amend the complaint, a district court must identify the complaint deficiencies so that the pro se litigant can use the opportunity to amend effectively as held by the Second, Seventh, Eights, and Ninth Circuits.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether when granting a pro se litigant leave to amend the complaint, a district court must identify the complaint deficiencies so that the pro se litigant can use the opportunity to amend effectively
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-11-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-10-21
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-23
Waiver of right of respondent Stanford University to respond filed.
2019-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 1, 2019)
Attorneys
Jennifer Lu
Jennifer Lu — Petitioner
Stanford University
Don Willenburg — Gordon & Rees, Respondent