IN THIS CASE THE GRAUD JURY
GRAND JURY IMPEDED
THE STATES ATORNEY SPECCALLY
WAS IMPE-DED(BY)
MURDER AND THE TRCTICO IMPLOPED (BY) CHICAGO POLUICE
ATER BESING IMPEDED (BYSTATGO AHORNEROMITO
FOR ELONY MURDER EXPERIEOING THE IMPROPER ACTOS
BY THE STATEO AHORNEY COLCERNING HE MOST
PERTIUNELT QUESTIOCO Of THE CHARCE.
EVEN WITH MULTIPLEDESREPINCIES IN THE PROCESS
FOUND GUILTY.
A
POLICY WAS (NLSOIGNORED (BY) TRIA COURT
LEAVING S DEAD CRITTCALY WOUNDED AD ISPARALYET
THE MNDRUME O ON SCEN OfICER.
OF THE EVELT WHICH I8 IN TOTAL CONTRADICTION TO
STATE CLAM, HOW WAS THIS IGNORE.
D CORRECTLY
THSR WOULD B NO fINOUNG Of GULT of
ELONY MURDER.

PRESET TRIAL COURT DOCUMEUTATIOL THAT WIN
WHICH DIRESCTHY AECTED THE CHARGE Of ELONY
MURDER IN THIS CASE.
GRANO UURY PREVIENTING SPKCIC LUNEO Of QUESTIONING, CONCERRING POLICE TACTICG) AND PONCYO
GOVERINE "OEADLY FORCE.
AHORNE TO DO TTETTONALY, DTEREARING WITH
THE GRAND JURY TRIN DOCUMENTATION (AHHACHED)
PHEASE REVIEW THIS PETTTIONER HAS CHALENGESD
SNTENCS IN A COLATERIAL AHUCK OPOST- CONVICTTON
RELIE AS WELN
JUSTICE IS NOT SERVED WIN PROPER DUE PROCIESS
WERE USED TO OBTAIN SND CONVICTION.
AND BRING JUSTICE TO HIM IN THIS WRONGU CONVICTIOK

Was the petition (by) the state's attorney's office denied by the lower court, and did the lower court err in denying the petition to vacate the conviction of felony murder and the death sentence imposed by Chicago police?