1. WETHER THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IS IN "CONFLICT" WITH THE CIRCUT COURTS CASE IN[ MICHAEL D. HURD V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 864 F:3d 671 (DC APP) ON THE "ISSUE OF PRECLUSION" WHEN THE COURT DISMI SSED HIS [SECTION 1983 ] ON IDENTICAL SIMULAR GROUNDS.

2. DID THE"UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS"FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VIOLATE PETITIONERS "EQUAL PROTECTION"OF THE LAW WHEN THE COURT DENIED PETITIONERS[SECTION 1983] ON IDENTICAL AND SIMULAR GROUNDS[IN]MICHAEL D. HURD V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 864 F.3d 671 (DC APP) ON THE "ISSUE OF PRECLUSION.

3. WETHER THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA "ABUSED ITS DISCRETION"WHEN THE COURT DISMISSED THE "PERSONAL CAPACITY"CLAIM IN HIS SECTION N 1983 THAT WAS NEVER RESPONDED TO OR DENIED OR ADMITTED BY RESPONDENTS. PURSUANT TO RULE 8 b 6 FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURES

Whether the United States Court of Appeal for the District of Columbia is in conflict with the circuit courts on the issue of preclusion