No. 19-5018
Gettus Leroy Mintz v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.
IFP
Tags: actual-innocence brady-violation certificate-of-appealability constitutional-review conviction-standard criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-misconduct procedural-default reasonable-doubt
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. DOES THE WILLFUL AND SERIAL DENIAL OF ATTEMPIS TO DEMONSTRATE ACTVAL INNOCENCE, BY BOTH
COURIS AND COUNSEL, PRESENT AT A MINIHUM, THE DEBATABLE QUALITY NECESSAPY TO RECEIVE A COA,
IF NOT THE THOROUGH REVIEW TO VACATE,IN THE ABSNCE OH PROCF BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the willful and serial denial of attempts to demonstrate actual innocence, by the courts and counsel, presents at a minimum the debatable quality necessary to receive a COA, if not the thorough review to vacate in the absence of proof beyond a reasonable doubt?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 31, 2019)
Attorneys
Gettus L. Mintz
Gettus L. Mintz — Petitioner