1. The district court abused its discretion by not relying on the erroneous legal premise that a citizen(s) of the state of Louisiana and this great country deserves a fair trail by jury. Not allowing evidence to be presented in a timely manor as stated in the constitution. Leaving appellant and citizen(s) open to attacks, injuries, and other hateful actions bought on by Appellee(s) and others.

2. Assuming - if this Court of our country would have properly addressed this matter the outcome would have been resulted, by evidence presented to trail and jurors. In failing to properly comply with its own laws and rules of the United States of America appellant was force to file appeal.

Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying the petitioner a fair trial by jury and the opportunity to present evidence against the respondents