No. 19-5014
Ricardo Donate-Cardona v. United States
IFP
Tags: affidavit appointed-counsel civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-review court-filing defendant-dissatisfaction due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel in-forma-pauperis indigent-status legal-redress poverty-affidavit sixth-amendment standing substitute-counsel
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel requires a court to appoint substitute counsel when a defendant expresses dissatisfaction with appointed counsel
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2019-10-15
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 588 U. S. ___ (2019).
2019-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-08-30
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2019-07-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 30, 2019.
2019-07-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 31, 2019 to August 30, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 31, 2019)
Attorneys
Ricardo Donate-Cardona
Ricardo Donate-Cardona — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent